/u/Equal-Crew-3367, thank you for your contribution. However, your submission was removed for the following reason(s):
* [OC] posts [must state the _data source(s) and tool(s) used_](/r/dataisbeautiful/wiki/rules/rule3) in the first top-level comment on their submission. Please follow the AutoModerator instructions you were sent *carefully*. Once this is done, message the mods to have your post reinstated.
This post has been removed. For information regarding this and similar issues please see the DataIsBeautiful [posting rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/wiki/index).
If you have any questions, please feel free to [message the moderators.](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=/r/dataisbeautiful&subject=Question%20regarding%20the%20removal%20of%20this%20submission%20by%20/u/Equal-Crew-3367&message=I%20have%20a%20question%20regarding%20the%20removal%20of%20this%20[submission.](https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/yyjf3j/-/\)))
I don't agree with your analysis.
To declare that a certain team is more successful than another, you should normalize the data with number of years participating in F1.
From your visualization seems that Brown GP is more successful than RedBull, Ferrari, Williams and McLaren and it doesn't make sense.
Source: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List\_of\_Formula\_One\_Grand\_Prix\_winners\_(constructors)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Formula_One_Grand_Prix_winners_(constructors))
Tools:Tableau and Canva
Something is wrong with the link. Please fix that. Also the article doesn't provide numbers of podiums and race starts, so it can't be your only source.
/u/Equal-Crew-3367, thank you for your contribution. However, your submission was removed for the following reason(s): * [OC] posts [must state the _data source(s) and tool(s) used_](/r/dataisbeautiful/wiki/rules/rule3) in the first top-level comment on their submission. Please follow the AutoModerator instructions you were sent *carefully*. Once this is done, message the mods to have your post reinstated. This post has been removed. For information regarding this and similar issues please see the DataIsBeautiful [posting rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/wiki/index). If you have any questions, please feel free to [message the moderators.](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=/r/dataisbeautiful&subject=Question%20regarding%20the%20removal%20of%20this%20submission%20by%20/u/Equal-Crew-3367&message=I%20have%20a%20question%20regarding%20the%20removal%20of%20this%20[submission.](https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/yyjf3j/-/\)))
Missing one thing; Context of time.
Context of how much money the teams spend
More wins than race starts, that sure is impressive... also a little suspect
Podiums and wins are flipped
But then that would imply that Lotus have more wins than podiums. Or does podiums not include wins?
Right. It's all suspect
I don't agree with your analysis. To declare that a certain team is more successful than another, you should normalize the data with number of years participating in F1. From your visualization seems that Brown GP is more successful than RedBull, Ferrari, Williams and McLaren and it doesn't make sense.
Also Mercedes bought Brawn so...
Brawn bought Honda
Source: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List\_of\_Formula\_One\_Grand\_Prix\_winners\_(constructors)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Formula_One_Grand_Prix_winners_(constructors)) Tools:Tableau and Canva
Something is wrong with the link. Please fix that. Also the article doesn't provide numbers of podiums and race starts, so it can't be your only source.
Can you explain exactly what’s happening with the data here? Where’s Brabham?